DRESNER v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE, 378 U.S. 539 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court
DRESNER v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE, 378 U.S. 539 (1964) 378 U.S. 539DRESNER ET AL. v. CITY OF
TALLAHASSEE.
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FLORIDA, SECOND JUDICIAL
CIRCUIT.
No. 35.
Argued October 23, 1963. Questions certified to Supreme Court of
Florida December 2, 1963.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.
Howard Dixon and Carl Rachlin argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the briefs were Alfred I. Hopkins and Tobias Simon.
Edward J. Hill and Roy T. Rhodes argued the cause for respondent. With them on the brief was Rivers Buford, Jr.
PER CURIAM.
The questions which this Court certified to the Supreme Court of Florida, 375 U.S. 136, having been answered in the affirmative, 164 So. 2d 208, the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. 28 U.S.C. 1257.
U.S. Supreme Court
DRESNER v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE, 378 U.S. 539 (1964) 378 U.S. 539 DRESNER ET AL. v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE.CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FLORIDA, SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT.
No. 35.
Argued October 23, 1963. Questions certified to Supreme Court of Florida December 2, 1963.
Decided June 22, 1964.
Certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted. Howard Dixon and Carl Rachlin argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the briefs were Alfred I. Hopkins and Tobias Simon. Edward J. Hill and Roy T. Rhodes argued the cause for respondent. With them on the brief was Rivers Buford, Jr. PER CURIAM. The questions which this Court certified to the Supreme Court of Florida, 375 U.S. 136, having been answered in the affirmative, 164 So. 2d 208, the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. 28 U.S.C. 1257. Page 378 U.S. 539, 540
