BENKO v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY CO., 378 U.S. 126 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court
BENKO v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY CO., 378 U.S. 126 (1964)
378 U.S. 126 BENKO v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 1345, Misc.
Decided June 15, 1964.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 231 Md. 419, 190 A.2d 638.
Appellant pro se.
Cornelius H. Doherty for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
BENKO v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY CO., 378 U.S. 126 (1964)
378 U.S. 126 BENKO v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 1345, Misc.
Decided June 15, 1964.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 231 Md. 419, 190 A.2d 638.
Appellant pro se.
Cornelius H. Doherty for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Page 378 U.S. 126, 127
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.