BENKO v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY CO., 378 U.S. 126 (1964)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
BENKO v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY CO., 378 U.S. 126 (1964) 378 U.S. 126BENKO v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT &
INDEMNITY CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 1345, Misc.
Decided June 15, 1964.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 231 Md. 419, 190 A.2d 638.
Appellant pro se.
Cornelius H. Doherty for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 1345, Misc.
Decided June 15, 1964.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Reported below: 231 Md. 419, 190 A.2d 638. Appellant pro se. Cornelius H. Doherty for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. Page 378 U.S. 126, 127
U.S. Supreme Court
BENKO v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY CO., 378 U.S. 126 (1964) 378 U.S. 126 BENKO v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY CO. ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 1345, Misc.
Decided June 15, 1964.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Reported below: 231 Md. 419, 190 A.2d 638. Appellant pro se. Cornelius H. Doherty for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. Page 378 U.S. 126, 127
Search This Case
