MITCHELL BROS. TRUCK LINES v. UNITED STATES
378 U.S. 125 (1964)

 Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

MITCHELL BROS. TRUCK LINES v. UNITED STATES, 378 U.S. 125 (1964)

378 U.S. 125

MITCHELL BROS. TRUCK LINES v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON.
No. 993.
Decided June 15, 1964.

225 F. Supp. 755, affirmed.

William F. White for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane, Francis A. Silver and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

DUNNE LEASES CARS & TRUCKS, INC. v. LUSSIER, <a href="/cases/federal/us/378/125/case.html">378 U.S. 125</a> (1964) 378 U.S. 125 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DUNNE LEASES CARS & TRUCKS, INC. v. LUSSIER, 378 U.S. 125 (1964)

378 U.S. 125

DUNNE LEASES CARS & TRUCKS, INC., v. LUSSIER, REGISTRAR OF MOTOR VEHICLES
FOR RHODE ISLAND.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF RHODE ISLAND, PROVIDENCE COUNTY. No. 1029.
Decided June 15, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: See ___ R. I. ___, 196 A. 2d 728.

Abraham Belilove and Samuel J. Kolodney for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 378 U.S. 125, 126




Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.