DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL v. AMMEX WARE., 378 U.S. 124 (1964)
Decided:
June 15, 1964
Syllabus
Decided June 15, 1964.
U.S. Supreme Court
DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL v. AMMEX WARE., 378 U.S. 124 (1964) 378 U.S. 124DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE
CONTROL FOR CALIFORNIA ET AL. v. AMMEX
WAREHOUSE CO. OF SAN YSIDRO, INC., ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF
Decided June 15, 1964.
224 F. Supp. 546, affirmed.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, E. G. Funke, Assistant Attorney General and Felice R. Cutter and Warren H. Deering, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellants.
George D. Byfield for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., 377 U.S. 324.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., supra.
Opinions
WAREHOUSE CO. OF SAN YSIDRO, INC., ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 919.
Decided June 15, 1964.
224 F. Supp. 546, affirmed. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, E. G. Funke, Assistant Attorney General and Felice R. Cutter and Warren H. Deering, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellants. George D. Byfield for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., 377 U.S. 324. MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., supra. Page 378 U.S. 124, 125
U.S. Supreme Court
DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL v. AMMEX WARE., 378 U.S. 124 (1964) 378 U.S. 124 DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL FOR CALIFORNIA ET AL. v. AMMEXWAREHOUSE CO. OF SAN YSIDRO, INC., ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 919.
Decided June 15, 1964.
224 F. Supp. 546, affirmed. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, E. G. Funke, Assistant Attorney General and Felice R. Cutter and Warren H. Deering, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellants. George D. Byfield for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., 377 U.S. 324. MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., supra. Page 378 U.S. 124, 125
Search This Case
