DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL v. AMMEX WARE., 378 U.S. 124 (1964)
DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL FOR CALIFORNIA ET AL. v. AMMEX U.S. Supreme Court
DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL v. AMMEX WARE., 378 U.S. 124 (1964)
378 U.S. 124
WAREHOUSE CO. OF SAN YSIDRO, INC., ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OFCALIFORNIA.
No. 919.
Decided June 15, 1964.
224 F. Supp. 546, affirmed.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, E. G. Funke, Assistant Attorney General and Felice R. Cutter and Warren H. Deering, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellants.
George D. Byfield for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., 377 U.S. 324.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., supra.
U.S. Supreme Court
DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL v. AMMEX WARE., 378 U.S. 124 (1964)
378 U.S. 124 DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL FOR CALIFORNIA ET AL. v. AMMEX
WAREHOUSE CO. OF SAN YSIDRO, INC., ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA.
No. 919.Decided June 15, 1964.
224 F. Supp. 546, affirmed.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, E. G. Funke, Assistant Attorney General and Felice R. Cutter and Warren H. Deering, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellants.
George D. Byfield for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., 377 U.S. 324.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., supra.
Page 378 U.S. 124, 125
