U.S. v. FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK., 377 U.S. 951 (1964)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

U.S. v. FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK. , 377 U.S. 951 (1964)

377 U.S. 951

UNITED STATES, petitioner,
v.
FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK.
No. 998.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 1, 1964

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Harold C. Wilkenfeld, for the United States.

Henry Harfield, for respondent.

Edward J. Ross, for Chase Manhattan Bank and others, as amici curiae.

Facts and opinion, U. S. v. Omar, S.A., D.C., 210 F.Supp. 773; 321 F.2d 14; 325 F.2d 1020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted and case placed on the summary calendar.[ U.S. v. First National City Bank. 377 U.S. 951 (1964) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

U.S. v. FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK. , 377 U.S. 951 (1964)

377 U.S. 951

UNITED STATES, petitioner,
v.
FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK.
No. 998.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 1, 1964

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Harold C. Wilkenfeld, for the United States.

Henry Harfield, for respondent.

Edward J. Ross, for Chase Manhattan Bank and others, as amici curiae.

Facts and opinion, U. S. v. Omar, S.A., D.C., 210 F.Supp. 773; 321 F.2d 14; 325 F.2d 1020.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted and case placed on the summary calendar.[ U.S. v. First National City Bank. 377 U.S. 951 (1964) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.