U.S. v. FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK.,
377 U.S. 951 (1964)
Annotate this Case
- Syllabus |
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. v. FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK. , 377 U.S. 951 (1964)
377 U.S. 951
UNITED STATES, petitioner,
v.
FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK.
No. 998.
Supreme Court of the United States
June 1, 1964
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Harold C. Wilkenfeld, for the United States.
Henry Harfield, for respondent.
Edward J. Ross, for Chase Manhattan Bank and others, as amici curiae.
Facts and opinion, U. S. v. Omar, S.A., D.C., 210 F.Supp. 773; 321 F.2d 14; 325 F.2d 1020.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted and case placed on the summary calendar.[ U.S. v. First National City Bank. 377 U.S. 951 (1964) ]
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.
