U.S. v. FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK., 377 U.S. 951 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. v. FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK. , 377 U.S. 951 (1964)
377 U.S. 951
UNITED STATES, petitioner,
v.
FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK.
No. 998.
Supreme Court of the United States
June 1, 1964
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Harold C. Wilkenfeld, for the United States.
Henry Harfield, for respondent.
Edward J. Ross, for Chase Manhattan Bank and others, as amici curiae.
Facts and opinion, U. S. v. Omar, S.A., D.C., 210 F. Supp. 773; 321 F.2d 14; 325 F.2d 1020.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted and case placed on the summary calendar.[ U.S. v. First National City Bank. 377 U.S. 951 (1964) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. v. FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK. , 377 U.S. 951 (1964)
UNITED STATES, petitioner,
v.
FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK.
No. 998.
Supreme Court of the United States
June 1, 1964
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Harold C. Wilkenfeld, for the United States.
Henry Harfield, for respondent.
Edward J. Ross, for Chase Manhattan Bank and others, as amici curiae.
Facts and opinion, U. S. v. Omar, S.A., D.C., 210 F. Supp. 773; 321 F.2d 14; 325 F.2d 1020.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted and case placed on the summary calendar.[ U.S. v. First National City Bank. 377 U.S. 951 (1964) ]
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.