U.S. v. FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK., 377 U.S. 951 (1964)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. v. FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK. , 377 U.S. 951 (1964)377 U.S. 951
UNITED STATES, petitioner,
v.
FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK.
No. 998.
Supreme Court of the United States
June 1, 1964
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Harold C. Wilkenfeld, for the United States.
Henry Harfield, for respondent.
Edward J. Ross, for Chase Manhattan Bank and others, as amici curiae.
Facts and opinion, U. S. v. Omar, S.A., D.C., 210 F. Supp. 773; 321 F.2d 14; 325 F.2d 1020.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of
Appeals for the Second Circuit granted and case placed on the
summary calendar.[ U.S. v. First National City Bank. 377 U.S. 951 (1964) ]
Opinions
v.
FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK.
No. 998. Supreme Court of the United States June 1, 1964 Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Harold C. Wilkenfeld, for the United States. Henry Harfield, for respondent. Edward J. Ross, for Chase Manhattan Bank and others, as amici curiae. Facts and opinion, U. S. v. Omar, S.A., D.C., 210 F. Supp. 773; 321 F.2d 14; 325 F.2d 1020. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted and case placed on the summary calendar.[ U.S. v. First National City Bank. 377 U.S. 951 (1964) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. v. FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK. , 377 U.S. 951 (1964) 377 U.S. 951 UNITED STATES, petitioner,v.
FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK.
No. 998. Supreme Court of the United States June 1, 1964 Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Harold C. Wilkenfeld, for the United States. Henry Harfield, for respondent. Edward J. Ross, for Chase Manhattan Bank and others, as amici curiae. Facts and opinion, U. S. v. Omar, S.A., D.C., 210 F. Supp. 773; 321 F.2d 14; 325 F.2d 1020. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted and case placed on the summary calendar.[ U.S. v. First National City Bank. 377 U.S. 951 (1964) ]
Search This Case
