TACOMA ASSOCIATION OF CREDIT MEN v. WASHINGTON, 377 U.S. 532 (1964)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

TACOMA ASSOCIATION OF CREDIT MEN v. WASHINGTON, 377 U.S. 532 (1964) 377 U.S. 532

TACOMA ASSOCIATION OF CREDIT MEN v. WASHINGTON.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 995.
Decided June 8, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 62 Wash. 2d 534, 383 P.2d 910.

Ofell H. Johnson for appellant.

John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and James A. Furber and Henry W. Wager, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 377 U.S. 532, 533

 



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

TACOMA ASSOCIATION OF CREDIT MEN v. WASHINGTON, 377 U.S. 532 (1964) 377 U.S. 532 TACOMA ASSOCIATION OF CREDIT MEN v. WASHINGTON.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 995.
Decided June 8, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 62 Wash. 2d 534, 383 P.2d 910.

Ofell H. Johnson for appellant.

John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and James A. Furber and Henry W. Wager, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 377 U.S. 532, 533