LYNCHBURG TRAFFIC BUREAU v. UNITED STATES, 377 U.S. 270 (1964)

U.S. Supreme Court

LYNCHBURG TRAFFIC BUREAU v. UNITED STATES, 377 U.S. 270 (1964)

377 U.S. 270

LYNCHBURG TRAFFIC BUREAU v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT
OF VIRGINIA. No. 931.
Decided May 25, 1964.

225 F. Supp. 874, affirmed.

W. G. Burnette for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Arthur J. Murphy, Jr., Robert W. Ginnane and Thomas H. Ploss for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.

Martin A. Meyer, Jr., Robert B. Claytor and John W. Hanifin for rail appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 377 U.S. 270, 271

 


U.S. Supreme Court

LYNCHBURG TRAFFIC BUREAU v. UNITED STATES, 377 U.S. 270 (1964)

377 U.S. 270

LYNCHBURG TRAFFIC BUREAU v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT
OF VIRGINIA. No. 931.
Decided May 25, 1964.

225 F. Supp. 874, affirmed.

W. G. Burnette for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Arthur J. Murphy, Jr., Robert W. Ginnane and Thomas H. Ploss for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.

Martin A. Meyer, Jr., Robert B. Claytor and John W. Hanifin for rail appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 377 U.S. 270, 271

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.