LYNCHBURG TRAFFIC BUREAU v. UNITED STATES, 377 U.S. 270 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court
LYNCHBURG TRAFFIC BUREAU v. UNITED STATES, 377 U.S. 270 (1964)
377 U.S. 270 LYNCHBURG TRAFFIC BUREAU v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT
OF VIRGINIA. No. 931.
Decided May 25, 1964.
225 F. Supp. 874, affirmed.
W. G. Burnette for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Arthur J. Murphy, Jr., Robert W. Ginnane and Thomas H. Ploss for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.
Martin A. Meyer, Jr., Robert B. Claytor and John W. Hanifin for rail appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
LYNCHBURG TRAFFIC BUREAU v. UNITED STATES, 377 U.S. 270 (1964)
377 U.S. 270 LYNCHBURG TRAFFIC BUREAU v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT
OF VIRGINIA. No. 931.
Decided May 25, 1964.
225 F. Supp. 874, affirmed.
W. G. Burnette for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Arthur J. Murphy, Jr., Robert W. Ginnane and Thomas H. Ploss for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.
Martin A. Meyer, Jr., Robert B. Claytor and John W. Hanifin for rail appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Page 377 U.S. 270, 271
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.