LYNCHBURG TRAFFIC BUREAU v. UNITED STATES, 377 U.S. 270 (1964)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
LYNCHBURG TRAFFIC BUREAU v. UNITED STATES, 377 U.S. 270 (1964) 377 U.S. 270LYNCHBURG TRAFFIC BUREAU v. UNITED
STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN
DISTRICT
OF VIRGINIA. No. 931.
Decided May 25, 1964.
225 F. Supp. 874, affirmed.
W. G. Burnette for appellant.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Arthur J. Murphy, Jr., Robert W. Ginnane and Thomas H. Ploss for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.
Martin A. Meyer, Jr., Robert B. Claytor and John W. Hanifin for rail appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT
OF VIRGINIA. No. 931.
Decided May 25, 1964.
225 F. Supp. 874, affirmed. W. G. Burnette for appellant. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Arthur J. Murphy, Jr., Robert W. Ginnane and Thomas H. Ploss for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission. Martin A. Meyer, Jr., Robert B. Claytor and John W. Hanifin for rail appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 377 U.S. 270, 271
U.S. Supreme Court
LYNCHBURG TRAFFIC BUREAU v. UNITED STATES, 377 U.S. 270 (1964) 377 U.S. 270 LYNCHBURG TRAFFIC BUREAU v. UNITED STATES ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT
OF VIRGINIA. No. 931.
Decided May 25, 1964.
225 F. Supp. 874, affirmed. W. G. Burnette for appellant. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Arthur J. Murphy, Jr., Robert W. Ginnane and Thomas H. Ploss for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission. Martin A. Meyer, Jr., Robert B. Claytor and John W. Hanifin for rail appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 377 U.S. 270, 271
Search This Case
