RAYMOND v. WICKHAM, 377 U.S. 269 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court
RAYMOND v. WICKHAM, 377 U.S. 269 (1964) 377 U.S. 269 RAYMOND, DOING BUSINESS AS CRESTMARK DAIRY, v. WICKHAM, COMMISSIONER OF
AGRICULTURE AND MARKETS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, ALBANY COUNTY. No. 1096, Misc.
Decided May 25, 1964.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
AHLSTRAND v. UNITED STATES, 377 U.S. 269 (1964) 377 U.S. 269 AHLSTRAND v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA.
No. 1108, Misc.
Decided May 25, 1964.
Appeal dismissed.
Appellant pro se.
Solicitor General Cox for the United States, and John J. Wilson for the National Rifle Association of America, appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
U.S. Supreme Court
RAYMOND v. WICKHAM, 377 U.S. 269 (1964) 377 U.S. 269 RAYMOND, DOING BUSINESS AS CRESTMARK DAIRY, v. WICKHAM, COMMISSIONER OF
AGRICULTURE AND MARKETS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, ALBANY COUNTY. No. 1096, Misc.
Decided May 25, 1964.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
AHLSTRAND v. UNITED STATES, 377 U.S. 269 (1964) 377 U.S. 269 AHLSTRAND v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA.
No. 1108, Misc.
Decided May 25, 1964.
Appeal dismissed.
Appellant pro se.
Solicitor General Cox for the United States, and John J. Wilson for the National Rifle Association of America, appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Page 377 U.S. 269, 270
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.