SINCLAIR v. BAKER, 377 U.S. 215 (1964)

U.S. Supreme Court

SINCLAIR v. BAKER, 377 U.S. 215 (1964) 377 U.S. 215

SINCLAIR v. BAKER ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND
APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 949.
Decided May 18, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 219 Cal. App. 2d 817, 33 Cal. Rptr. 522.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 377 U.S. 215, 216

LUCKENBACH STEAMSHIP v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CAL., <a href="/cases/federal/us/377/215/case.html">377 U.S. 215</a> (1964) 377 U.S. 215 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LUCKENBACH STEAMSHIP v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CAL., 377 U.S. 215 (1964) 377 U.S. 215

LUCKENBACH STEAMSHIP CO., INC., v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD JUDICIAL
DISTRICT. No. 916.
Decided May 18, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 219 Cal. App. 2d 710, 33 Cal. Rptr. 544.

Hart H. Spiegel and John Hays for appellant.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, James E. Sabine, Assistant Attorney General, and Ernest P. Goodman and John J. Klee, Jr., Deputy Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

 


U.S. Supreme Court

SINCLAIR v. BAKER, 377 U.S. 215 (1964) 377 U.S. 215

SINCLAIR v. BAKER ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND
APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 949.
Decided May 18, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 219 Cal. App. 2d 817, 33 Cal. Rptr. 522.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 377 U.S. 215, 216

LUCKENBACH STEAMSHIP v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CAL., <a href="/cases/federal/us/377/215/case.html"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/377/215/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/377/215/">377 U.S. 215</a></a></a> (1964) 377 U.S. 215 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LUCKENBACH STEAMSHIP v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CAL., 377 U.S. 215 (1964) 377 U.S. 215

LUCKENBACH STEAMSHIP CO., INC., v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD JUDICIAL
DISTRICT. No. 916.
Decided May 18, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 219 Cal. App. 2d 710, 33 Cal. Rptr. 544.

Hart H. Spiegel and John Hays for appellant.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, James E. Sabine, Assistant Attorney General, and Ernest P. Goodman and John J. Klee, Jr., Deputy Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.