MARKS v. ESPERDY, 377 U.S. 214 (1964)

U.S. Supreme Court

MARKS v. ESPERDY, 377 U.S. 214 (1964)

377 U.S. 214

MARKS v. ESPERDY, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION
SERVICE.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 253.
Argued April 2, 1964.
Decided May 18, 1964.

315 F.2d 673, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Murray A. Gordon argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.

Charles Gordon argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and L. Paul Winings.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN took no part in the decision of this case.

Page 377 U.S. 214, 215




U.S. Supreme Court

MARKS v. ESPERDY, 377 U.S. 214 (1964)

377 U.S. 214

MARKS v. ESPERDY, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION
SERVICE.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 253.
Argued April 2, 1964.
Decided May 18, 1964.

315 F.2d 673, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Murray A. Gordon argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.

Charles Gordon argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and L. Paul Winings.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN took no part in the decision of this case.

Page 377 U.S. 214, 215

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.