CLINTON v. VIRGINIA, 377 U.S. 158 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court
CLINTON v. VIRGINIA, 377 U.S. 158 (1964)
377 U.S. 158 CLINTON v. VIRGINIA.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA.
No. 294.
Argued April 27, 1964.
Decided May 4, 1964.
204 Va. 275, 130 S.E.2d 437, reversed.
Calvin H. Childress argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
D. Gardiner Tyler, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs was Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to strike the supplemental brief on behalf of the respondent is denied. The judgment is reversed. Silverman v. United States, 365 U.S. 505; Ker v. California, 374 U.S. 23.
MR. JUSTICE CLARK, concurring: Since the Court finds that the "spiked" mike used by the police officers penetrated petitioner's premises sufficiently to be an actual trespass thereof, I join in the judgment.
MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissents.
U.S. Supreme Court
CLINTON v. VIRGINIA, 377 U.S. 158 (1964)
377 U.S. 158 CLINTON v. VIRGINIA.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA.
No. 294.
Argued April 27, 1964.
Decided May 4, 1964.
204 Va. 275, 130 S.E.2d 437, reversed.
Calvin H. Childress argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
D. Gardiner Tyler, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs was Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to strike the supplemental brief on behalf of the respondent is denied. The judgment is reversed. Silverman v. United States, 365 U.S. 505; Ker v. California, 374 U.S. 23.
MR. JUSTICE CLARK, concurring: Since the Court finds that the "spiked" mike used by the police officers penetrated petitioner's premises sufficiently to be an actual trespass thereof, I join in the judgment.
MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissents.
Page 377 U.S. 158, 159
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
