YRIBARNE v. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, 376 U.S. 783 (1964)

U.S. Supreme Court

YRIBARNE v. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, 376 U.S. 783 (1964)

376 U.S. 783

YRIBARNE v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 811.
Decided April 6, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 218 Cal. App. 2d 369, 32 Cal. Rptr. 847.

Herman F. Selvin for appellant.

John N. Cramer for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 376 U.S. 783, 784




U.S. Supreme Court

YRIBARNE v. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, 376 U.S. 783 (1964)

376 U.S. 783

YRIBARNE v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 811.
Decided April 6, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 218 Cal. App. 2d 369, 32 Cal. Rptr. 847.

Herman F. Selvin for appellant.

John N. Cramer for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 376 U.S. 783, 784

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.