CARTER v. FLORIDA, 376 U.S. 648 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court
CARTER v. FLORIDA, 376 U.S. 648 (1964) 376 U.S. 648 CARTER v. FLORIDA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 817.
Decided March 30, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 155 So. 2d 787.
Hal S. Ives for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
SUBURBAN TELEPHONE v. MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE, TELE., 376 U.S. 648 (1964) 376 U.S. 648SUBURBAN TELEPHONE CO. v. MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO.
No. 800.
Decided March 30, 1964.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 72 N. M. 411, 384 P.2d 684.
J. Kenneth Baird and Robert A. Sprecher for appellant.
J. H. Shepherd for Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co., and Julian S. Ertz for Tadlock et al., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
CARTER v. FLORIDA, 376 U.S. 648 (1964) 376 U.S. 648 CARTER v. FLORIDA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 817.
Decided March 30, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 155 So. 2d 787.
Hal S. Ives for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 376 U.S. 648, 649
U.S. Supreme Court
SUBURBAN TELEPHONE v. MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE, TELE., 376 U.S. 648 (1964) 376 U.S. 648SUBURBAN TELEPHONE CO. v. MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO.
No. 800.
Decided March 30, 1964.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 72 N. M. 411, 384 P.2d 684.
J. Kenneth Baird and Robert A. Sprecher for appellant.
J. H. Shepherd for Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co., and Julian S. Ertz for Tadlock et al., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
