IN RE CROW, 376 U.S. 647 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court
IN RE CROW, 376 U.S. 647 (1964)
376 U.S. 647 IN RE CROW.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 767.
Decided March 30, 1964.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Appellant pro se.
William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, for the Supreme Court of Ohio, in opposition.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
PORT OF BROOKINGS v. UNITED STATES, 376 U.S. 647 (1964)
376 U.S. 647 PORT OF BROOKINGS ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON.
No. 771.
Decided March 30, 1964.
Affirmed.
Lloyd Hammel, Assistant Attorney General of Oregon, and Sidney Teiser for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane, H. Neil Garson and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
IN RE CROW, 376 U.S. 647 (1964)
376 U.S. 647 IN RE CROW.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 767.
Decided March 30, 1964.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Appellant pro se.
William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, for the Supreme Court of Ohio, in opposition.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
PORT OF BROOKINGS v. UNITED STATES, 376 U.S. 647 (1964)
376 U.S. 647 PORT OF BROOKINGS ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON.
No. 771.
Decided March 30, 1964.
Affirmed.
Lloyd Hammel, Assistant Attorney General of Oregon, and Sidney Teiser for appellants.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane, H. Neil Garson and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
