IN RE CROW, 376 U.S. 647 (1964)

U.S. Supreme Court

IN RE CROW, 376 U.S. 647 (1964) 376 U.S. 647

IN RE CROW.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 767.
Decided March 30, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, for the Supreme Court of Ohio, in opposition.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

PORT OF BROOKINGS v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/376/647/">376 U.S. 647</a> (1964) 376 U.S. 647 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

PORT OF BROOKINGS v. UNITED STATES, 376 U.S. 647 (1964) 376 U.S. 647

PORT OF BROOKINGS ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON.
No. 771.
Decided March 30, 1964.

Affirmed.

Lloyd Hammel, Assistant Attorney General of Oregon, and Sidney Teiser for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane, H. Neil Garson and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 376 U.S. 647, 648

 


U.S. Supreme Court

IN RE CROW, 376 U.S. 647 (1964) 376 U.S. 647

IN RE CROW.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 767.
Decided March 30, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, for the Supreme Court of Ohio, in opposition.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

PORT OF BROOKINGS v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/376/647/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/376/647/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/376/647/">376 U.S. 647</a></a></a> (1964) 376 U.S. 647 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

PORT OF BROOKINGS v. UNITED STATES, 376 U.S. 647 (1964) 376 U.S. 647

PORT OF BROOKINGS ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON.
No. 771.
Decided March 30, 1964.

Affirmed.

Lloyd Hammel, Assistant Attorney General of Oregon, and Sidney Teiser for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane, H. Neil Garson and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 376 U.S. 647, 648

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.