KIRK v. BOEHM, 376 U.S. 512 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court
KIRK v. BOEHM, 376 U.S. 512 (1964) 376 U.S. 512 KIRK v. BOEHM, SUPERINTENDENT, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION,
PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OFPENNSYLVANIA.
Decided March 23, 1964.
216 F. Supp. 952, affirmed.
Appellant pro se.
John D. Killian III, Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Lewis B. Beatty, Jr. for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
CEPERO v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, 376 U.S. 512 (1964) 376 U.S. 512 CEPERO v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. Nos. 671, Misc., and 843, Misc.
Decided March 23, 1964.
Appeals dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM.
The appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
U.S. Supreme Court
KIRK v. BOEHM, 376 U.S. 512 (1964) 376 U.S. 512 KIRK v. BOEHM, SUPERINTENDENT, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION,
PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OFPENNSYLVANIA.
Decided March 23, 1964.
216 F. Supp. 952, affirmed.
Appellant pro se.
John D. Killian III, Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Lewis B. Beatty, Jr. for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
CEPERO v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, 376 U.S. 512 (1964) 376 U.S. 512 CEPERO v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. Nos. 671, Misc., and 843, Misc.
Decided March 23, 1964.
Appeals dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM.
The appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
Page 376 U.S. 512, 513
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.