KIRK v. BOEHM
376 U.S. 512 (1964)
Annotate this Case
- Syllabus |
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
KIRK v. BOEHM, 376 U.S. 512 (1964)
376 U.S. 512 KIRK v. BOEHM, SUPERINTENDENT, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION,
PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 753.Decided March 23, 1964.
216 F. Supp. 952, affirmed.
Appellant pro se.
John D. Killian III, Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Lewis B. Beatty, Jr. for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
CEPERO v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, 376 U.S. 512 (1964)
376 U.S. 512 CEPERO v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. Nos. 671, Misc., and 843, Misc.
Decided March 23, 1964.
Appeals dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM.
The appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
