KIRK v. BOEHM, 376 U.S. 512 (1964)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

KIRK v. BOEHM, 376 U.S. 512 (1964)

376 U.S. 512

KIRK v. BOEHM, SUPERINTENDENT, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION,
PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF

PENNSYLVANIA.

 No. 753.
Decided March 23, 1964.

216 F. Supp. 952, affirmed.

Appellant pro se.

John D. Killian III, Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Lewis B. Beatty, Jr. for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

CEPERO v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/376/512/case.html">376 U.S. 512</a> (1964) 376 U.S. 512 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CEPERO v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, 376 U.S. 512 (1964)

376 U.S. 512

CEPERO v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. Nos. 671, Misc., and 843, Misc.
Decided March 23, 1964.

Appeals dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM.

The appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Page 376 U.S. 512, 513




U.S. Supreme Court

KIRK v. BOEHM, 376 U.S. 512 (1964)

376 U.S. 512

KIRK v. BOEHM, SUPERINTENDENT, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION,
PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF

PENNSYLVANIA.

 No. 753.
Decided March 23, 1964.

216 F. Supp. 952, affirmed.

Appellant pro se.

John D. Killian III, Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Lewis B. Beatty, Jr. for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

CEPERO v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/376/512/case.html">376 U.S. 512</a> (1964) 376 U.S. 512 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CEPERO v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, 376 U.S. 512 (1964)

376 U.S. 512

CEPERO v. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. Nos. 671, Misc., and 843, Misc.
Decided March 23, 1964.

Appeals dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM.

The appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Page 376 U.S. 512, 513

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.