SHUTTLESWORTH v. BIRMINGHAM, 376 U.S. 339 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court
SHUTTLESWORTH v. BIRMINGHAM, 376 U.S. 339 (1964)
376 U.S. 339 SHUTTLESWORTH v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF ALABAMA.
No. 168.
Argued February 27, 1964.
Decided March 9, 1964.
42 Ala. App. 1, 149 So. 2d 921, reversed.
Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were James M. Nabrit III, Peter A. Hall and Orzell Billingsley, Jr.
J. M. Breckenridge argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals of Alabama is reversed. Cole v. Arkansas, 333 U.S. 196; Williams v. Georgia, 349 U.S. 375.
MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
SHUTTLESWORTH v. BIRMINGHAM, 376 U.S. 339 (1964)
376 U.S. 339 SHUTTLESWORTH v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF ALABAMA.
No. 168.
Argued February 27, 1964.
Decided March 9, 1964.
42 Ala. App. 1, 149 So. 2d 921, reversed.
Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were James M. Nabrit III, Peter A. Hall and Orzell Billingsley, Jr.
J. M. Breckenridge argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals of Alabama is reversed. Cole v. Arkansas, 333 U.S. 196; Williams v. Georgia, 349 U.S. 375.
MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Page 376 U.S. 339, 340
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.