Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.,
376 U.S. 234 (1964)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc., 376 U.S. 234 (1964)

Compco Corporation v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.

No. 106

Argued January 16, 1964

Decided March 9, 1964

376 U.S. 234


Design which is not entitled to design patent may be copied at will even though it identifies maker to trade, and injunction against such copying or an accounting for damages for copying is in conflict with federal patent laws. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co., ante, p. 376 U. S. 225, followed. Pp. 376 U. S. 234-239.

311 F.2d 26, reversed.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.