CITY OF SEATTLE v. BEEZER, 376 U.S. 224 (1964)

U.S. Supreme Court

CITY OF SEATTLE v. BEEZER, 376 U.S. 224 (1964)

376 U.S. 224

CITY OF SEATTLE ET AL. v. BEEZER ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 677.
Decided March 2, 1964.

Appeal dismissed; certiorari granted; and judgment reversed. Reported below: 62 Wash. 2d 569, 383 P.2d 895.

A. L. Newbould, Richard S. White, William A. Helsell, Robert L. McCarty and Charles F. Wheatley, Jr. for appellants.

Alfred J. Schweppe for Beezer, and Clarence C. Dill, Joseph Volpe, Jr. and Bennett Boskey for Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County, Washington, appellees.

Solicitor General Cox, Richard A. Solomon, Howard E. Wahrenbrock and David J. Bardin for the Federal Power Commission, as amicus curiae, in support of appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of Tacoma, 357 U.S. 320.

Page 376 U.S. 224, 225




U.S. Supreme Court

CITY OF SEATTLE v. BEEZER, 376 U.S. 224 (1964)

376 U.S. 224

CITY OF SEATTLE ET AL. v. BEEZER ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 677.
Decided March 2, 1964.

Appeal dismissed; certiorari granted; and judgment reversed. Reported below: 62 Wash. 2d 569, 383 P.2d 895.

A. L. Newbould, Richard S. White, William A. Helsell, Robert L. McCarty and Charles F. Wheatley, Jr. for appellants.

Alfred J. Schweppe for Beezer, and Clarence C. Dill, Joseph Volpe, Jr. and Bennett Boskey for Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County, Washington, appellees.

Solicitor General Cox, Richard A. Solomon, Howard E. Wahrenbrock and David J. Bardin for the Federal Power Commission, as amicus curiae, in support of appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of Tacoma, 357 U.S. 320.

Page 376 U.S. 224, 225

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.