DIAMOND v. LOUISIANA, 376 U.S. 201 (1964)

U.S. Supreme Court

DIAMOND v. LOUISIANA, 376 U.S. 201 (1964)

376 U.S. 201

DIAMOND v. LOUISIANA.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 100.
Argued February 20, 1964.
Decided February 24, 1964.

Certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.

James M. Nabrit III argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Jack Greenberg, Wiley A. Branton and Johnnie A. Jones.

Ralph L. Roy argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 376 U.S. 201, 202




U.S. Supreme Court

DIAMOND v. LOUISIANA, 376 U.S. 201 (1964)

376 U.S. 201

DIAMOND v. LOUISIANA.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 100.
Argued February 20, 1964.
Decided February 24, 1964.

Certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.

James M. Nabrit III argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Jack Greenberg, Wiley A. Branton and Johnnie A. Jones.

Ralph L. Roy argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 376 U.S. 201, 202

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.