NATIONAL ASS'N, ADVANCE., COLORED PEOPLE v. WEBB'S CITY, 376 U.S. 190 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court
NATIONAL ASS'N, ADVANCE., COLORED PEOPLE v. WEBB'S CITY, 376 U.S. 190 (1964)
376 U.S. 190NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE ET AL. v. WEBB'S
CITY, INC.
CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT. No. 362.
Decided February 17, 1964.
Motion to advance denied; judgment vacated; and cause remanded.
Reported below: 152 So.2d 179.
Robert L. Carter, Fred G. Minnis and Richard Feder for petitioners.
D. M. Patrick for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Petitioners' motion to advance is denied. On respondent's suggestion of mootness, the judgment of the District Court of Appeals of Florida, Second District, is vacated and the cause remanded to that court for appropriate proceedings to effectuate respondent's representation that the injunction below will be set aside, without prejudice to the right of petitioner to move to vacate today's order in the event the injunction is not promptly vacated by the trial court.
U.S. Supreme Court
NATIONAL ASS'N, ADVANCE., COLORED PEOPLE v. WEBB'S CITY, 376 U.S. 190 (1964)
376 U.S. 190NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE ET AL. v. WEBB'S
CITY, INC.
CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, SECOND DISTRICT. No. 362.
Decided February 17, 1964.
Motion to advance denied; judgment vacated; and cause remanded.
Reported below: 152 So.2d 179.
Robert L. Carter, Fred G. Minnis and Richard Feder for petitioners.
D. M. Patrick for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Petitioners' motion to advance is denied. On respondent's suggestion of mootness, the judgment of the District Court of Appeals of Florida, Second District, is vacated and the cause remanded to that court for appropriate proceedings to effectuate respondent's representation that the injunction below will be set aside, without prejudice to the right of petitioner to move to vacate today's order in the event the injunction is not promptly vacated by the trial court.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
