CERTIFIED CREDIT CORP. v. BOWERS, 375 U.S. 84 (1963)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

CERTIFIED CREDIT CORP. v. BOWERS, 375 U.S. 84 (1963)

375 U.S. 84

CERTIFIED CREDIT CORP. v. BOWERS, TAX COMMISSIONER OF OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 430.
Decided November 18, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 174 Ohio St. 239, 188 N. E. 2d 594.

Robert L. Barton, Joseph B. DeVennish and Joseph R. Hague for appellant.

William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and Daronne R. Tate, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 375 U.S. 84, 85




U.S. Supreme Court

CERTIFIED CREDIT CORP. v. BOWERS, 375 U.S. 84 (1963)

375 U.S. 84

CERTIFIED CREDIT CORP. v. BOWERS, TAX COMMISSIONER OF OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 430.
Decided November 18, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 174 Ohio St. 239, 188 N. E. 2d 594.

Robert L. Barton, Joseph B. DeVennish and Joseph R. Hague for appellant.

William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and Daronne R. Tate, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 375 U.S. 84, 85

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.