RAPOPORT v. OHIO, 375 U.S. 6 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court
RAPOPORT v. OHIO, 375 U.S. 6 (1963)
375 U.S. 6 RAPOPORT v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 212.
Decided October 14, 1963.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 174 Ohio St. 134, 186 N. E. 2d 840.
Bernard R. Hollander for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
HENRY v. CITY OF ROCK HILL, 375 U.S. 6 (1963)
375 U.S. 6 HENRY ET AL. v. CITY OF ROCK HILL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 97.
Decided October 14, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Reported below: 241 S. C. 427, 128 S.E. 2d 775.
Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, Matthew J. Perry, Lincoln C. Jenkins, Jr., Donald James Sampson and Willie T. Smith, Jr. for petitioners.
Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and Everett N. Brandon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of South Carolina for further consideration in light of Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229.
U.S. Supreme Court
RAPOPORT v. OHIO, 375 U.S. 6 (1963)
375 U.S. 6 RAPOPORT v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 212.
Decided October 14, 1963.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 174 Ohio St. 134, 186 N. E. 2d 840.
Bernard R. Hollander for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
HENRY v. CITY OF ROCK HILL, 375 U.S. 6 (1963)
375 U.S. 6 HENRY ET AL. v. CITY OF ROCK HILL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 97.
Decided October 14, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Reported below: 241 S. C. 427, 128 S.E. 2d 775.
Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, Matthew J. Perry, Lincoln C. Jenkins, Jr., Donald James Sampson and Willie T. Smith, Jr. for petitioners.
Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and Everett N. Brandon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of South Carolina for further consideration in light of Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
