RAPOPORT v. OHIO
375 U.S. 6 (1963)

 Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

RAPOPORT v. OHIO, 375 U.S. 6 (1963)

375 U.S. 6

RAPOPORT v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 212.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 174 Ohio St. 134, 186 N. E. 2d 840.

Bernard R. Hollander for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 375 U.S. 6, 7

HENRY v. CITY OF ROCK HILL, <a href="/cases/federal/us/375/6/case.html">375 U.S. 6</a> (1963) 375 U.S. 6 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

HENRY v. CITY OF ROCK HILL, 375 U.S. 6 (1963)

375 U.S. 6

HENRY ET AL. v. CITY OF ROCK HILL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 97.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 241 S. C. 427, 128 S.E. 2d 775.

Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, Matthew J. Perry, Lincoln C. Jenkins, Jr., Donald James Sampson and Willie T. Smith, Jr. for petitioners.

Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and Everett N. Brandon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of South Carolina for further consideration in light of Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229.




Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.