ARROW CARRIER CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 375 U.S. 452 (1964)

U.S. Supreme Court

ARROW CARRIER CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 375 U.S. 452 (1964)

375 U.S. 452

ARROW CARRIER CORP. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 467.
Decided January 20, 1964.

219 F. Supp. 43, affirmed.

Christian V. Graf for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.

William A. Goichman, Joseph C. Bruno and Edward Munce for the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.

Ernest R. von Starck, Robert H. Young and Carl Helmetag, Jr. for the Pennsylvania Railroad Co. et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission to be added as a party appellee is granted. The motion to correct the caption to include the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Highway Express Lines, Inc., and Modern Transfer Co., Inc., as parties appellee is granted. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 375 U.S. 452, 1




U.S. Supreme Court

ARROW CARRIER CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 375 U.S. 452 (1964)

375 U.S. 452

ARROW CARRIER CORP. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 467.
Decided January 20, 1964.

219 F. Supp. 43, affirmed.

Christian V. Graf for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.

William A. Goichman, Joseph C. Bruno and Edward Munce for the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.

Ernest R. von Starck, Robert H. Young and Carl Helmetag, Jr. for the Pennsylvania Railroad Co. et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission to be added as a party appellee is granted. The motion to correct the caption to include the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Highway Express Lines, Inc., and Modern Transfer Co., Inc., as parties appellee is granted. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 375 U.S. 452, 1

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.