CADE v. LOUISIANA
375 U.S. 44 (1963)

 Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

CADE v. LOUISIANA, 375 U.S. 44 (1963)

375 U.S. 44

CADE v. LOUISIANA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 340.
Decided October 21, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

James Sharp, Jr. for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 375 U.S. 44, 45

FIELDS v. SOUTH CAROLINA, <a href="/cases/federal/us/375/44/case.html">375 U.S. 44</a> (1963) 375 U.S. 44 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

FIELDS v. SOUTH CAROLINA, 375 U.S. 44 (1963)

375 U.S. 44

FIELDS ET AL. v. SOUTH CAROLINA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 335.
Decided October 21, 1963.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, Matthew J. Perry and Lincoln C. Jenkins, Jr. for petitioners.

Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, Everett N. Brandon, Assistant Attorney General, and Julian S. Wolfe for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is reversed. Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229.




Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.