RATIGAN v. DAVIS, 375 U.S. 394 (1964)

U.S. Supreme Court

RATIGAN v. DAVIS, 375 U.S. 394 (1964) 375 U.S. 394

RATIGAN ET AL. v. DAVIS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA.
No. 547.
Decided January 6, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 175 Neb. 416, 122 N.W.2d 12.

Benjamin M. Wall for appellants.

William R. King and Seymour L. Smith for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

SPATT v. CITY OF NEW YORK, <a href="/cases/federal/us/375/394/">375 U.S. 394</a> (1964) 375 U.S. 394 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SPATT v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 375 U.S. 394 (1964) 375 U.S. 394

SPATT v. CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 562.
Decided January 6, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 13 N.Y.2d 618, 191 N.E.2d 91.

Charles E. Bernstein for appellant.

Leo A. Larkin, Stanley Buchsbaum and Solomon Portnow for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 375 U.S. 394, 395

 


U.S. Supreme Court

RATIGAN v. DAVIS, 375 U.S. 394 (1964) 375 U.S. 394

RATIGAN ET AL. v. DAVIS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA.
No. 547.
Decided January 6, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 175 Neb. 416, 122 N.W.2d 12.

Benjamin M. Wall for appellants.

William R. King and Seymour L. Smith for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

SPATT v. CITY OF NEW YORK, <a href="/cases/federal/us/375/394/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/375/394/"><a class="related-case" href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/375/394/">375 U.S. 394</a></a></a> (1964) 375 U.S. 394 (1964) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SPATT v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 375 U.S. 394 (1964) 375 U.S. 394

SPATT v. CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 562.
Decided January 6, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 13 N.Y.2d 618, 191 N.E.2d 91.

Charles E. Bernstein for appellant.

Leo A. Larkin, Stanley Buchsbaum and Solomon Portnow for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 375 U.S. 394, 395

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.