RATIGAN v. DAVIS, 375 U.S. 394 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court
RATIGAN v. DAVIS, 375 U.S. 394 (1964) 375 U.S. 394 RATIGAN ET AL. v. DAVIS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA.
No. 547.
Decided January 6, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 175 Neb. 416, 122 N.W.2d 12.
Benjamin M. Wall for appellants.
William R. King and Seymour L. Smith for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
SPATT v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 375 U.S. 394 (1964) 375 U.S. 394 SPATT v. CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 562.
Decided January 6, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 13 N.Y.2d 618, 191 N.E.2d 91.
Charles E. Bernstein for appellant.
Leo A. Larkin, Stanley Buchsbaum and Solomon Portnow for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
RATIGAN v. DAVIS, 375 U.S. 394 (1964) 375 U.S. 394 RATIGAN ET AL. v. DAVIS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA.
No. 547.
Decided January 6, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 175 Neb. 416, 122 N.W.2d 12.
Benjamin M. Wall for appellants.
William R. King and Seymour L. Smith for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
SPATT v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 375 U.S. 394 (1964) 375 U.S. 394 SPATT v. CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 562.
Decided January 6, 1964.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 13 N.Y.2d 618, 191 N.E.2d 91.
Charles E. Bernstein for appellant.
Leo A. Larkin, Stanley Buchsbaum and Solomon Portnow for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Page 375 U.S. 394, 395
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
