SMITH v. CALIFORNIA, 375 U.S. 259 (1963)

U.S. Supreme Court

SMITH v. CALIFORNIA, 375 U.S. 259 (1963)

375 U.S. 259

SMITH v. CALIFORNIA.
CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. No. 72.
Decided December 16, 1963.

Judgment vacated and case remanded.

Stanley Fleishman and Sam Rosenwein for petitioner.

Roger Arnebergh, Philip E. Grey and Wm. E. Doran for respondent.

Briefs of amici curiae, urging reversal, were filed by Edward de Grazia for Allen et al.; by Thomas M. Thomas for American Library Association, and by Nathan L. Schoichet, A. L. Wirin and Fred Okrand for American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California.

Charles H. Keating, Jr. for Citizens for Decent Literature, Inc., et al., as amici curiae, in support of respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of Citizens for Decent Literature, Inc., et al., for leave to file a brief, as amici curiae, is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, for further consideration in light of the decision of the Supreme Court of California in Zeitlin v. Arnebergh, 59 Cal. 2d 901, 383 P.2d 152.

Page 375 U.S. 259, 260




U.S. Supreme Court

SMITH v. CALIFORNIA, 375 U.S. 259 (1963)

375 U.S. 259

SMITH v. CALIFORNIA.
CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. No. 72.
Decided December 16, 1963.

Judgment vacated and case remanded.

Stanley Fleishman and Sam Rosenwein for petitioner.

Roger Arnebergh, Philip E. Grey and Wm. E. Doran for respondent.

Briefs of amici curiae, urging reversal, were filed by Edward de Grazia for Allen et al.; by Thomas M. Thomas for American Library Association, and by Nathan L. Schoichet, A. L. Wirin and Fred Okrand for American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California.

Charles H. Keating, Jr. for Citizens for Decent Literature, Inc., et al., as amici curiae, in support of respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of Citizens for Decent Literature, Inc., et al., for leave to file a brief, as amici curiae, is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Department of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, for further consideration in light of the decision of the Supreme Court of California in Zeitlin v. Arnebergh, 59 Cal. 2d 901, 383 P.2d 152.

Page 375 U.S. 259, 260

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.