BROTHERHOOD, MAINTENANCE, WAY EMPLOYES v. UNITED STATES, 375 U.S. 216 (1963)

U.S. Supreme Court

BROTHERHOOD, MAINTENANCE, WAY EMPLOYES v. UNITED STATES, 375 U.S. 216 (1963)

375 U.S. 216

BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES ET AL. v. UNITED STATES
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF

MICHIGAN.

No. 510.
Decided December 9, 1963.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 511, Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees et al. v. United States et al., also on appeal from the same Court.

221 F. Supp. 19, affirmed.

Clarence M. Mulholland, Richard R. Lyman, Edward J. Hickey, Jr., William G. Mahoney and Harry A. Carson for appellants in No. 510. Charles S. Rhyne, Edward D. Means, Jr. and Alfred J. Tighe for appellants in No. 511.

Solicitor General Cox for the United States, and Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.

Edward K. Wheeler, Hewitt S. Biaett, Robert G. Seaks and Kenneth H. Ekin for appellee carriers.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 375 U.S. 216, 217




U.S. Supreme Court

BROTHERHOOD, MAINTENANCE, WAY EMPLOYES v. UNITED STATES, 375 U.S. 216 (1963)

375 U.S. 216

BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES ET AL. v. UNITED STATES
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF

MICHIGAN.

No. 510.
Decided December 9, 1963.*

[Footnote *] Together with No. 511, Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees et al. v. United States et al., also on appeal from the same Court.

221 F. Supp. 19, affirmed.

Clarence M. Mulholland, Richard R. Lyman, Edward J. Hickey, Jr., William G. Mahoney and Harry A. Carson for appellants in No. 510. Charles S. Rhyne, Edward D. Means, Jr. and Alfred J. Tighe for appellants in No. 511.

Solicitor General Cox for the United States, and Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.

Edward K. Wheeler, Hewitt S. Biaett, Robert G. Seaks and Kenneth H. Ekin for appellee carriers.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 375 U.S. 216, 217

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.