CEPERO v. PELOSO, 375 U.S. 16 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court
CEPERO v. PELOSO, 375 U.S. 16 (1963)
375 U.S. 16 CEPERO v. PELOSO.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 116, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1963.
Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Appellant pro se.
Solicitor General Cox for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
U.S. Supreme Court
REATZ v. NEW YORK, 375 U.S. 16 (1963)
375 U.S. 16 REATZ v. NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPREME COURT
OF NEW YORK, SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 50, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Petitioner pro se.
William I. Siegel for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, for further consideration in light of Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12, Eskridge v. Washington Prison Board, 357 U.S. 214, and Norvell v. Illinois, 373 U.S. 420.
U.S. Supreme Court
CEPERO v. PELOSO, 375 U.S. 16 (1963)
375 U.S. 16 CEPERO v. PELOSO.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 116, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1963.
Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Appellant pro se.
Solicitor General Cox for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
U.S. Supreme Court
REATZ v. NEW YORK, 375 U.S. 16 (1963)
375 U.S. 16 REATZ v. NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPREME COURT
OF NEW YORK, SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 50, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Petitioner pro se.
William I. Siegel for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, for further consideration in light of Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12, Eskridge v. Washington Prison Board, 357 U.S. 214, and Norvell v. Illinois, 373 U.S. 420.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
