SALAS v. TEXAS, 375 U.S. 15 (1963)

U.S. Supreme Court

SALAS v. TEXAS, 375 U.S. 15 (1963)

375 U.S. 15

SALAS v. TEXAS.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS.
No. 118, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 365 S. W. 2d 174.

Joseph A. Calamia for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 375 U.S. 15, 16


STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF KANSAS v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/375/15/case.html">375 U.S. 15</a> (1963) 375 U.S. 15 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF KANSAS v. UNITED STATES, 375 U.S. 15 (1963)

375 U.S. 15

STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF KANSAS v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS.
No. 217.
Decided October 14, 1963.

216 F. Supp. 376, affirmed.

Byron M. Gray and Robert Londerholm for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Stanton P. Sender for the United States et al.

Harvey Huston and Roth A. Gatewood for railroad appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.




U.S. Supreme Court

SALAS v. TEXAS, 375 U.S. 15 (1963)

375 U.S. 15

SALAS v. TEXAS.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS.
No. 118, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 365 S. W. 2d 174.

Joseph A. Calamia for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 375 U.S. 15, 16


STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF KANSAS v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/cases/federal/us/375/15/case.html">375 U.S. 15</a> (1963) 375 U.S. 15 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF KANSAS v. UNITED STATES, 375 U.S. 15 (1963)

375 U.S. 15

STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF KANSAS v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS.
No. 217.
Decided October 14, 1963.

216 F. Supp. 376, affirmed.

Byron M. Gray and Robert Londerholm for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Stanton P. Sender for the United States et al.

Harvey Huston and Roth A. Gatewood for railroad appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.