IN RE JENISON, 375 U.S. 14 (1963)

U.S. Supreme Court

IN RE JENISON, 375 U.S. 14 (1963)

375 U.S. 14

IN RE JENISON.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA.
No. 238.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 265 Minn. 96, 120 N. W. 2d 515.

John S. Connolly for petitioner.

Walter F. Mondale, Attorney General of Minnesota, and Charles E. Houston, Solicitor General, for the State of Minnesota.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Minnesota for further consideration in light of Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398.


JOHNSON v. WILKINS, <a href="/cases/federal/us/375/14/case.html">375 U.S. 14</a> (1963) 375 U.S. 14 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

JOHNSON v. WILKINS, 375 U.S. 14 (1963)

375 U.S. 14

JOHNSON v. WILKINS, WARDEN.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 141, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 12 N. Y. 2d 843, 187 N. E. 2d 473.

Appellant pro se.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, and Winifred C. Stanley, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 375 U.S. 14, 15




U.S. Supreme Court

IN RE JENISON, 375 U.S. 14 (1963)

375 U.S. 14

IN RE JENISON.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA.
No. 238.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 265 Minn. 96, 120 N. W. 2d 515.

John S. Connolly for petitioner.

Walter F. Mondale, Attorney General of Minnesota, and Charles E. Houston, Solicitor General, for the State of Minnesota.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Minnesota for further consideration in light of Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398.


JOHNSON v. WILKINS, <a href="/cases/federal/us/375/14/case.html">375 U.S. 14</a> (1963) 375 U.S. 14 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

JOHNSON v. WILKINS, 375 U.S. 14 (1963)

375 U.S. 14

JOHNSON v. WILKINS, WARDEN.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 141, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 12 N. Y. 2d 843, 187 N. E. 2d 473.

Appellant pro se.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, and Winifred C. Stanley, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 375 U.S. 14, 15

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.