DAVIS v. SOJA, 374 U.S. 495 (1963)

U.S. Supreme Court

DAVIS v. SOJA, 374 U.S. 495 (1963)

374 U.S. 495

DAVIS, TRUSTEE, v. SOJA, INTERNAL REVENUE AGENT.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.
No. 271.
Decided June 17, 1963.

Judgment vacated and case remanded to District Court with directions to dismiss complaint as moot.

Reported below: 303 F.2d 601.

Walter J. Rockler for petitioner.

Solicitor General Cox for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

It appearing from the joint suggestion of mootness that this case is moot, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot.

Page 374 U.S. 495, 496




U.S. Supreme Court

DAVIS v. SOJA, 374 U.S. 495 (1963)

374 U.S. 495

DAVIS, TRUSTEE, v. SOJA, INTERNAL REVENUE AGENT.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.
No. 271.
Decided June 17, 1963.

Judgment vacated and case remanded to District Court with directions to dismiss complaint as moot.

Reported below: 303 F.2d 601.

Walter J. Rockler for petitioner.

Solicitor General Cox for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

It appearing from the joint suggestion of mootness that this case is moot, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot.

Page 374 U.S. 495, 496

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.