DAVIS v. SOJA, 374 U.S. 495 (1963)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
DAVIS v. SOJA, 374 U.S. 495 (1963) 374 U.S. 495DAVIS, TRUSTEE, v. SOJA, INTERNAL
REVENUE AGENT.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH
CIRCUIT.
No. 271.
Decided June 17, 1963.
Judgment vacated and case remanded to District Court with directions to dismiss complaint as moot.
Reported below: 303 F.2d 601.
Walter J. Rockler for petitioner.
Solicitor General Cox for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
It appearing from the joint suggestion of mootness that this case is moot, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot.
Opinions
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.
No. 271.
Decided June 17, 1963.
Judgment vacated and case remanded to District Court with directions to dismiss complaint as moot. Reported below: 303 F.2d 601. Walter J. Rockler for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox for respondent. PER CURIAM. It appearing from the joint suggestion of mootness that this case is moot, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot. Page 374 U.S. 495, 496
U.S. Supreme Court
DAVIS v. SOJA, 374 U.S. 495 (1963) 374 U.S. 495 DAVIS, TRUSTEE, v. SOJA, INTERNAL REVENUE AGENT.CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.
No. 271.
Decided June 17, 1963.
Judgment vacated and case remanded to District Court with directions to dismiss complaint as moot. Reported below: 303 F.2d 601. Walter J. Rockler for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox for respondent. PER CURIAM. It appearing from the joint suggestion of mootness that this case is moot, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot. Page 374 U.S. 495, 496
Search This Case
