BRADLEY v. IOWA, 374 U.S. 490 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court
BRADLEY v. IOWA, 374 U.S. 490 (1963) 374 U.S. 490BRADLEY v. IOWA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA.
No. 934, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 254 Iowa 211, 116 N.W.2d 439.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
374 U.S. 490 (1963) 374 U.S. 490 (1963) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
MAYS v. CALIFORNIA, 374 U.S. 490 (1963) 374 U.S. 490MAYS v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF
CALIFORNIA.
No. 871, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Reported below: See 205 Cal. App. 2d 798, 23 Cal. Rptr. 605.
Petitioner pro se.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353.
MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S., at 358, 360.
U.S. Supreme Court
BRADLEY v. IOWA, 374 U.S. 490 (1963) 374 U.S. 490 BRADLEY v. IOWA.APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA.
No. 934, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Reported below: 254 Iowa 211, 116 N.W.2d 439. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. Page 374 U.S. 490, 491
374 U.S. 490 (1963) 374 U.S. 490 (1963) ">
U.S. Supreme Court
MAYS v. CALIFORNIA, 374 U.S. 490 (1963) 374 U.S. 490 MAYS v. CALIFORNIA.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 871, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. Reported below: See 205 Cal. App. 2d 798, 23 Cal. Rptr. 605. Petitioner pro se. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353. MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S., at 358, 360.
