LAINO v. NEW YORK, 374 U.S. 104 (1963)

U.S. Supreme Court

LAINO v. NEW YORK, 374 U.S. 104 (1963)

374 U.S. 104

LAINO v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, FOURTH
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 992.
Decided June 10, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Edward H. Levine and Vernon C. Rossner for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Robert E. Fischer and Maxwell B. Spoont, Special Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 374 U.S. 104, 105




U.S. Supreme Court

LAINO v. NEW YORK, 374 U.S. 104 (1963)

374 U.S. 104

LAINO v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, FOURTH
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 992.
Decided June 10, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Edward H. Levine and Vernon C. Rossner for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Robert E. Fischer and Maxwell B. Spoont, Special Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 374 U.S. 104, 105

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.