CEPERO v. UNITED STATES CONGRESS, 373 U.S. 545 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court
CEPERO v. UNITED STATES CONGRESS, 373 U.S. 545 (1963) 373 U.S. 545 CEPERO v. UNITED STATES CONGRESS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 1024, Misc.
Decided May 27, 1963.
Appeal dismissed.
Reported below: ___ F. Supp. ___.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
ALABAMA v. UNITED STATES, 373 U.S. 545 (1963) 373 U.S. 545 ALABAMA ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BILL OF COMPLAINT.
No. 15, Original.
Decided May 27, 1963.
Motion for leave to file proposed bill of complaint, as amended, denied.
J. Kirkman Jackson, John P. Kohn, George Stephen Leonard, Richard L. Hirshberg, John W. Vardaman, John A. Caddell and Thos. B. Hill, Jr. for plaintiffs.
Solicitor General Cox, Ralph S. Spritzer and Louis F. Claiborne for the United States et al.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to file the proposed bill of complaint, as amended, is denied. In essence the papers show no more than that the President has made ready to exercise the authority conferred upon him by 10 U.S.C. 333 by alerting and stationing military personnel in the Birmingham area. Such purely preparatory measures and their alleged adverse general effects upon the plaintiffs afford no basis for the granting of any relief.
MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
CEPERO v. UNITED STATES CONGRESS, 373 U.S. 545 (1963) 373 U.S. 545 CEPERO v. UNITED STATES CONGRESS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 1024, Misc.
Decided May 27, 1963.
Appeal dismissed.
Reported below: ___ F. Supp. ___.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
ALABAMA v. UNITED STATES, 373 U.S. 545 (1963) 373 U.S. 545 ALABAMA ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BILL OF COMPLAINT.
No. 15, Original.
Decided May 27, 1963.
Motion for leave to file proposed bill of complaint, as amended, denied.
J. Kirkman Jackson, John P. Kohn, George Stephen Leonard, Richard L. Hirshberg, John W. Vardaman, John A. Caddell and Thos. B. Hill, Jr. for plaintiffs.
Solicitor General Cox, Ralph S. Spritzer and Louis F. Claiborne for the United States et al.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to file the proposed bill of complaint, as amended, is denied. In essence the papers show no more than that the President has made ready to exercise the authority conferred upon him by 10 U.S.C. 333 by alerting and stationing military personnel in the Birmingham area. Such purely preparatory measures and their alleged adverse general effects upon the plaintiffs afford no basis for the granting of any relief.
MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
