CEPERO v. UNITED STATES, 373 U.S. 544 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court
CEPERO v. UNITED STATES, 373 U.S. 544 (1963) 373 U.S. 544 CEPERO v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 1227, Misc.
Decided May 27, 1963.
Appeal dismissed.
Reported below: ___ F. Supp. ___.
Appellant pro se.
Solicitor General Cox for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
SMITH v. KANSAS, 373 U.S. 544 (1963) 373 U.S. 544 SMITH v. KANSAS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.
No. 966, Misc.
Decided May 27, 1963.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 188 Kan. 473, 363 P.2d 541.
Appellant pro se.
William M. Ferguson, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth and Park McGee, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
U.S. Supreme Court
CEPERO v. UNITED STATES, 373 U.S. 544 (1963) 373 U.S. 544 CEPERO v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK. No. 1227, Misc.
Decided May 27, 1963.
Appeal dismissed.
Reported below: ___ F. Supp. ___.
Appellant pro se.
Solicitor General Cox for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
U.S. Supreme Court
SMITH v. KANSAS, 373 U.S. 544 (1963) 373 U.S. 544 SMITH v. KANSAS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.
No. 966, Misc.
Decided May 27, 1963.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 188 Kan. 473, 363 P.2d 541.
Appellant pro se.
William M. Ferguson, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth and Park McGee, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
