FOOD FAIR STORES v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, 373 U.S. 541 (1963)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

FOOD FAIR STORES v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, 373 U.S. 541 (1963) 373 U.S. 541

FOOD FAIR STORES, INC., ET AL. v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF CITY OF POMPANO
BEACH, FLORIDA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. 973.
Decided May 27, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Harry Shapiro for appellants.

Robert B. Cochran for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


373 U.S. 541 (1963) 373 U.S. 541 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MILE ROAD CORP. v. CITY OF BOSTON, 373 U.S. 541 (1963) 373 U.S. 541

MILE ROAD CORP. v. CITY OF BOSTON.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, SUFFOLK COUNTY.
No. 981.
Decided May 27, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: See 345 Mass. ___, 187 N.E.2d 826.

Edward M. Dangel and Leo E. Sherry for appellant.

William H. Kerr for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 373 U.S. 541, 542

 



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

FOOD FAIR STORES v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, 373 U.S. 541 (1963) 373 U.S. 541 FOOD FAIR STORES, INC., ET AL. v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF CITY OF POMPANO
BEACH, FLORIDA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. 973.
Decided May 27, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Harry Shapiro for appellants.

Robert B. Cochran for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


373 U.S. 541 (1963) 373 U.S. 541 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MILE ROAD CORP. v. CITY OF BOSTON, 373 U.S. 541 (1963) 373 U.S. 541 MILE ROAD CORP. v. CITY OF BOSTON.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, SUFFOLK COUNTY.
No. 981.
Decided May 27, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: See 345 Mass. ___, 187 N.E.2d 826.

Edward M. Dangel and Leo E. Sherry for appellant.

William H. Kerr for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 373 U.S. 541, 542