FOOD FAIR STORES v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, 373 U.S. 541 (1963)

U.S. Supreme Court

FOOD FAIR STORES v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, 373 U.S. 541 (1963)

373 U.S. 541

FOOD FAIR STORES, INC., ET AL. v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF CITY OF POMPANO
BEACH, FLORIDA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. 973.
Decided May 27, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Harry Shapiro for appellants.

Robert B. Cochran for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


MILE ROAD CORP. v. CITY OF BOSTON, <a href="/cases/federal/us/373/541/case.html">373 U.S. 541</a> (1963) 373 U.S. 541 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MILE ROAD CORP. v. CITY OF BOSTON, 373 U.S. 541 (1963)

373 U.S. 541

MILE ROAD CORP. v. CITY OF BOSTON.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, SUFFOLK COUNTY.
No. 981.
Decided May 27, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: See 345 Mass. ___, 187 N. E. 2d 826.

Edward M. Dangel and Leo E. Sherry for appellant.

William H. Kerr for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 373 U.S. 541, 542




U.S. Supreme Court

FOOD FAIR STORES v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, 373 U.S. 541 (1963)

373 U.S. 541

FOOD FAIR STORES, INC., ET AL. v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF CITY OF POMPANO
BEACH, FLORIDA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. 973.
Decided May 27, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Harry Shapiro for appellants.

Robert B. Cochran for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


MILE ROAD CORP. v. CITY OF BOSTON, <a href="/cases/federal/us/373/541/case.html">373 U.S. 541</a> (1963) 373 U.S. 541 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MILE ROAD CORP. v. CITY OF BOSTON, 373 U.S. 541 (1963)

373 U.S. 541

MILE ROAD CORP. v. CITY OF BOSTON.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, SUFFOLK COUNTY.
No. 981.
Decided May 27, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: See 345 Mass. ___, 187 N. E. 2d 826.

Edward M. Dangel and Leo E. Sherry for appellant.

William H. Kerr for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 373 U.S. 541, 542

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.