FOOD FAIR STORES v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, 373 U.S. 541 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court
FOOD FAIR STORES v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, 373 U.S. 541 (1963)
373 U.S. 541FOOD FAIR STORES, INC., ET AL. v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF CITY OF POMPANO
BEACH, FLORIDA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. 973.
Decided May 27, 1963.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Harry Shapiro for appellants.
Robert B. Cochran for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
MILE ROAD CORP. v. CITY OF BOSTON, 373 U.S. 541 (1963)
373 U.S. 541 MILE ROAD CORP. v. CITY OF BOSTON.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, SUFFOLK COUNTY.
No. 981.
Decided May 27, 1963.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: See 345 Mass. ___, 187 N. E. 2d 826.
Edward M. Dangel and Leo E. Sherry for appellant.
William H. Kerr for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
FOOD FAIR STORES v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, 373 U.S. 541 (1963)
373 U.S. 541FOOD FAIR STORES, INC., ET AL. v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF CITY OF POMPANO
BEACH, FLORIDA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. 973.
Decided May 27, 1963.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Harry Shapiro for appellants.
Robert B. Cochran for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
MILE ROAD CORP. v. CITY OF BOSTON, 373 U.S. 541 (1963)
373 U.S. 541 MILE ROAD CORP. v. CITY OF BOSTON.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, SUFFOLK COUNTY.
No. 981.
Decided May 27, 1963.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: See 345 Mass. ___, 187 N. E. 2d 826.
Edward M. Dangel and Leo E. Sherry for appellant.
William H. Kerr for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
