ILLINOIS v. UNITED STATES, 373 U.S. 378 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court
ILLINOIS v. UNITED STATES, 373 U.S. 378 (1963)
373 U.S. 378 ILLINOIS ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 937.
Decided May 20, 1963.
213 F. Supp. 83, affirmed.
William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, Edward V. Hanrahan, Special Assistant Attorney General, Harold A. Cowen, Assistant Attorney General, and S. Ashley Guthrie for appellants.
Robert W. Ginnane and Stanton P. Sender for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; and James J. Magner, Frederick E. Stout and L. Agnew Myers, Jr. for Chicago North Shore & Milwaukee Railway, appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
ILLINOIS v. UNITED STATES, 373 U.S. 378 (1963)
373 U.S. 378 ILLINOIS ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 937.
Decided May 20, 1963.
213 F. Supp. 83, affirmed.
William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, Edward V. Hanrahan, Special Assistant Attorney General, Harold A. Cowen, Assistant Attorney General, and S. Ashley Guthrie for appellants.
Robert W. Ginnane and Stanton P. Sender for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; and James J. Magner, Frederick E. Stout and L. Agnew Myers, Jr. for Chicago North Shore & Milwaukee Railway, appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Page 373 U.S. 378, 379
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.