ILLINOIS v. UNITED STATES, 373 U.S. 378 (1963)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
ILLINOIS v. UNITED STATES, 373 U.S. 378 (1963) 373 U.S. 378ILLINOIS ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET
AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN
DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 937.
Decided May 20, 1963.
213 F. Supp. 83, affirmed.
William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, Edward V. Hanrahan, Special Assistant Attorney General, Harold A. Cowen, Assistant Attorney General, and S. Ashley Guthrie for appellants.
Robert W. Ginnane and Stanton P. Sender for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; and James J. Magner, Frederick E. Stout and L. Agnew Myers, Jr. for Chicago North Shore & Milwaukee Railway, appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Opinions
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 937.
Decided May 20, 1963.
213 F. Supp. 83, affirmed. William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, Edward V. Hanrahan, Special Assistant Attorney General, Harold A. Cowen, Assistant Attorney General, and S. Ashley Guthrie for appellants. Robert W. Ginnane and Stanton P. Sender for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; and James J. Magner, Frederick E. Stout and L. Agnew Myers, Jr. for Chicago North Shore & Milwaukee Railway, appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 373 U.S. 378, 379
U.S. Supreme Court
ILLINOIS v. UNITED STATES, 373 U.S. 378 (1963) 373 U.S. 378 ILLINOIS ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 937.
Decided May 20, 1963.
213 F. Supp. 83, affirmed. William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, Edward V. Hanrahan, Special Assistant Attorney General, Harold A. Cowen, Assistant Attorney General, and S. Ashley Guthrie for appellants. Robert W. Ginnane and Stanton P. Sender for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; and James J. Magner, Frederick E. Stout and L. Agnew Myers, Jr. for Chicago North Shore & Milwaukee Railway, appellees. PER CURIAM. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Page 373 U.S. 378, 379
Search This Case
