FLORA CONSTRUCTION CO. v. GRAND JUNCTION STEEL FAB., 373 U.S. 240 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court
FLORA CONSTRUCTION CO. v. GRAND JUNCTION STEEL FAB., 373 U.S. 240 (1963)
373 U.S. 240 FLORA CONSTRUCTION CO. v. GRAND JUNCTION STEEL FABRICATING CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA.
No. 949.
Decided May 13, 1963.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
SHOTT v. OHIO, 373 U.S. 240 (1963)
373 U.S. 240 SHOTT v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 877.
Decided May 13, 1963.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 173 Ohio St. 542, 184 N. E. 2d 213.
Thurman Arnold, James G. Andrews, Jr. and John A. Lloyd, Jr. for appellant.
Harry C. Schoettmer for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
U.S. Supreme Court
FLORA CONSTRUCTION CO. v. GRAND JUNCTION STEEL FAB., 373 U.S. 240 (1963)
373 U.S. 240 FLORA CONSTRUCTION CO. v. GRAND JUNCTION STEEL FABRICATING CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA.
No. 949.
Decided May 13, 1963.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
SHOTT v. OHIO, 373 U.S. 240 (1963)
373 U.S. 240 SHOTT v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 877.
Decided May 13, 1963.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Reported below: 173 Ohio St. 542, 184 N. E. 2d 213.
Thurman Arnold, James G. Andrews, Jr. and John A. Lloyd, Jr. for appellant.
Harry C. Schoettmer for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
