LaFORGE v. WAINWRIGHT, 372 U.S. 774 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court
LaFORGE v. WAINWRIGHT, 372 U.S. 774 (1963)
372 U.S. 774 LaFORGE v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 6, Misc.
Decided April 22, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Petitioner pro se.
Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and Bruce R. Jacob, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335.
U.S. Supreme Court
LaFORGE v. WAINWRIGHT, 372 U.S. 774 (1963)
372 U.S. 774 LaFORGE v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 6, Misc.
Decided April 22, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Petitioner pro se.
Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and Bruce R. Jacob, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335.
Page 372 U.S. 774, 775
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.