WATT v. WAINWRIGHT
372 U.S. 769 (1963)
Annotate this Case
- Syllabus |
- Case
U.S. Supreme Court
WATT v. WAINWRIGHT, 372 U.S. 769 (1963)
372 U.S. 769 WATT v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 575, Misc.
Decided April 22, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Petitioner pro se.
Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and A. G. Spicola, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335.
U.S. Supreme Court
ARNOLD v. DIRECTOR, FLORIDA DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, 372 U.S. 769 (1963)
372 U.S. 769 ARNOLD v. DIRECTOR, FLORIDA DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 771, Misc.
Decided April 22, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Reported below: 145 So.2d 478.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335.
