WATT v. WAINWRIGHT
372 U.S. 769 (1963)

 Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

WATT v. WAINWRIGHT, 372 U.S. 769 (1963)

372 U.S. 769

WATT v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 575, Misc.
Decided April 22, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and A. G. Spicola, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335.

ARNOLD v. DIRECTOR, FLORIDA DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, <a href="/cases/federal/us/372/769/case.html">372 U.S. 769</a> (1963) 372 U.S. 769 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ARNOLD v. DIRECTOR, FLORIDA DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, 372 U.S. 769 (1963)

372 U.S. 769

ARNOLD v. DIRECTOR, FLORIDA DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 771, Misc.
Decided April 22, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 145 So.2d 478.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335.

Page 372 U.S. 769, 770




Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.