SYMONS v. CALIFORNIA, 372 U.S. 711 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court
SYMONS v. CALIFORNIA, 372 U.S. 711 (1963)
372 U.S. 711 SYMONS v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 301, Misc.
Decided April 15, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Reported below: 201 Cal. App. 2d 825, 20 Cal. Rptr. 400.
Petitioner pro se.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Calvin W. Torrance, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353.
MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S., at 358, 360.
U.S. Supreme Court
SYMONS v. CALIFORNIA, 372 U.S. 711 (1963)
372 U.S. 711 SYMONS v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 301, Misc.
Decided April 15, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Reported below: 201 Cal. App. 2d 825, 20 Cal. Rptr. 400.
Petitioner pro se.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Calvin W. Torrance, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353.
MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S., at 358, 360.
Page 372 U.S. 711, 712
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.