HOLMES v. CALIFORNIA
Annotate this Case
372 U.S. 710 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court
HOLMES v. CALIFORNIA, 372 U.S. 710 (1963)372 U.S. 710
HOLMES v. CALIFORNIA ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 70, Misc.
Decided April 15, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Reported below: 197 Cal. App. 2d 699, 17 Cal. Rptr. 599.
Petitioner pro se.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353.
MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S., at 358, 360.
MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.