HOLMES v. CALIFORNIA, 372 U.S. 710 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court
HOLMES v. CALIFORNIA, 372 U.S. 710 (1963) 372 U.S. 710HOLMES v. CALIFORNIA ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF
APPEAL
OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 70, Misc.
Decided April 15, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.
Reported below: 197 Cal. App. 2d 699, 17 Cal. Rptr. 599.
Petitioner pro se.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353.
MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S., at 358, 360.
MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
HOLMES v. CALIFORNIA, 372 U.S. 710 (1963) 372 U.S. 710 HOLMES v. CALIFORNIA ET AL.ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 70, Misc.
Decided April 15, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. Reported below: 197 Cal. App. 2d 699, 17 Cal. Rptr. 599. Petitioner pro se. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353. MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S., at 358, 360. MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Page 372 U.S. 710, 711
